One day I found myself fighting with a moose. Well, we weren’t
actually fighting, and he wasn’t really a moose. I was trolling a local DJ on
Facebook, and I’m not sure “trolling” is the right word either. Nonetheless,
the Moose and I were in some sort of online skirmish about a cry closet. Yes, a
cry closet. After some radio banter highlighting the moronic
audaciousness of the closet, Moose DJ posted a “What’s Trending” video about it
on Facebook. The Moose hated the closet! The video he posted summarizes the
controversy concerning a University of Utah art student’s installation of a
tiny, free-standing closet in the library during finals week. The
slightly-smaller-than-a-porta-potty structure could hold a single occupant and
a few stuffed animals---picture a large upright casket but one for dying
scholarly dreams and teddy bears. Directions on the vault of tears stated that
students studying for finals should “use the closet for a 10-minute break”---I
assume one might resort to a cry closet break when chugging Mountain Dew,
dumping M&Ms into jars of peanut butter, assuming the fetal position under
a bookshelf, sucking liquid cocaine drinks through a straw, or staring at MTV
for hours could not relieve the stress---not that I’m familiar with such
college-era tactics.
I’m going to be honest, my instinctive reaction to the cry closet
wasn’t positive. I had certainly bemoaned college-kid coddling in the
past---what university instructor hasn’t? I definitely debated the need
for puppy petting during finals week. That’s a real thing. I’ll never forget
the day I went for a coffee and saw the fat furballs waddling around in the student
center. My silver- dollar-sized eyes slowly scanned the surreal environment
filled with students cuddling pooches, vibrating in massage chairs, and
snorting air at an oxygen bar. I thought, what did that heavily pierced
barista put in my Chai latte, and what is this over-indulgent comfort dome?
For goodness sakes, back in the day, poor shoeless me had to outrun herds of
rabid mad cows in raging blizzards just to get to school. (Well, I rode the
bus, but there were still foaming-at-the-mouth bullies and mad drivers---the
postman in the movie Funny Farm comes to mind but that representation is
not quite accurate.)
Coming from a farming family, the idea of “pulling up your
bootstraps and getting to work” has been firmly rooted in my brain, so
sometimes my impulse is to criticize complaints. That little voice in my head
that sounds like my dad growls “buck up, buster!” To this day, I feel
extreme guilt if I take an afternoon nap. Yet, over the years, I have come to
realize that the simple “be tough” bootstrap mantra isn’t so simple; self-care
is incredibly important too. If you don’t take care of yourself, you’re no good
to anyone else. And scratching the fat belly of a puppy really does make things
better. You can curmudgeon your way through tasks without gleefully squeezing
some furry puppy fat---but why? As long as hard work still happens, it’s okay
to delight in life. Even though I had evolved a little, that stalwart farmer
work ethic still urged me to join the media feeding frenzy concerning the cry
closet.
I can never fully frenzy until I get all the facts, so I decided
to track down more information before joining Moose DJ’s warcry calling for the
shredded heads of the cry-closet teddy bears. Within 5 minutes of Google
surfing, I discovered that the closet was an art installation, an art student’s
final project. The University of Utah did not purchase the closet---it just
allowed the installation to be displayed in the library. Displaying student art
is pretty standard practice in university libraries. The box wasn’t
a “real” stress reliever sanctioned by the U of U at all. It was a piece of art
created to generate discussion and challenge the status quo. One
definition, according to Wikipedia (totally acceptable for pre-research
research, by the way), is that an installation of art:
bestows an unprecedented
importance on the observer's inclusion in that which he observes. The
expectations and social habits that the viewer takes with him into the space of
the installation will remain with him as he enters, to be either applied or
negated once he has taken in the new environment. What is common to nearly all
installation art is a consideration of the experience in total and the problems
it may present, namely the constant conflict between disinterested criticism
and sympathetic involvement.
Not only could I not frenzy, I had to contact that student’s
professor to make sure she had received an A+. Her cry closet project was a slam-dunk
success! Moose, me, and many others, with all of our expectations and biases,
were simply part of the art experiment, as public interaction/reaction is a
critical element of all art installations. The closet wasn’t there so students
could hide in a little box, sob, and cuddle teddy bears--- it was there to
generate discussions about student stress (real or imagined), self-care
(accepted or mocked), higher education (valuable or ridiculous), gullibility
and a million other things. In an interview, the artist Nemo Miller said, “I am
interested in humanity and the inherent complexities of the human
condition...One aspect of humanity that I am currently exploring is connections
and missed connections through communication. It’s been interesting to watch
the response to this piece about human emotions, and I’m proud to see the power
of art in action.” We all fell for it hook, line, and sinker. And viral media
was helping to highlight how people connect or disconnect from each other.
My research was done, but my trolling (er, truth spreading?) was
about to begin. I had to communicate with the Moose and share the facts. The
frenzied feeders did not need to fear or loathe the plushie-stuffed sob box. I
had to tell the people who had commented “Our country is in real trouble!” and
“Kids can't take being yelled at anymore!” on Moose’s post that the closet
would not destroy the USA, not today--not on my watch!
So, um, hey Moose:
It’s an art
installation—created by one student. The university did not put it up. The
purpose of art installations is to challenge ideas, get people thinking—“get
people going.” I think the student accomplished her mission!
With the enter key click, I thought Yes! The world’s safe from
the viral wave of cry closet misinformation! All can rest easy and smile. A
few minutes later I saw Moose’s reply.
Moose:
I'm not sure if it's this school but one schools
actually using it. And the real idea is ridiculous. It's called adulting 😂
Um, Wait. What? Is it
real? Crap. Did I miss something? I googled and googled and
found----nothing. I couldn’t find anything about “real” cry closets being
utilized in any schools. As far as I could tell, there were no colleges
promoting weeping and teddy bear fondling in small dark spaces. I checked the
comments on the original video thinking that someone might have posted some
more information. Clearly I had not learned my lesson about reading comments on
the internet:
“I want someone to swing the door open and yell ILL GIVE YOU
SOMETHING TO CRY ABOUT! Worked for me as a kid. Lol”
“What the hell happened that such a pathetic and weak generation
was allowed to survive this long? In the wild, they would have been abandoned
and/or killed for the survival of the species and pack. But noooo..not us
humans. We coddle the weak, hand out participation trophies, let generations of
one family survive on welfare, and now we have cry rooms. Damn this is sad.”
“OMG, what are they doing to our kids? What happened to just going
for a walk or the bathroom stall at school to take a minute for yourself! You
butter cups better get a clue, life's not fair, it can be hard and you better
buck up and get some self reliance, confidence in yourself. These colleges just
aren't preparing you for the real world.”
“Sure... I thought they were fighting to come out of the closet
and now society is trying to shove them back in!”
“This pod of shame should be connected to a carbon monoxide tank
so weak minded millennials can be factored out of the gene pool. No, most
people don't need this, you trite and worthless page.”
So, then I was horrified. But I decided to take a closer look at
the major media publications concerning the closet. Maybe those would be more
insightful. Some of the headlines were:
“‘Cry Closet’ in University Library for Students Stressed over Finals”--USA Today
“Let’s Embrace our Blubbering and Make Cry Closets Happen”--Slate
“University of Utah ‘Cry Closet’ Lets Students “Just Let it All Out” During Finals--CBSNews
“College Installs a ‘Cry Closet’ As Safe Space For Student Snowflakes”-- Fox News
As far as I could see, all the headlines were presenting the story
inaccurately. So I began mindlessly clicking on video clips---diving even
deeper into the madness of the cry closet. The first page and a half of Google
results highlighted a Tucker Carlson segment: “Higher Education at Work: ‘Cry
Closets’ for Snowflakes.” In the intro, Tucker briefly describes the closet and
asks “Is it time to go national with this?”
I realized my response to the Moose would not be as monumental as
previous thought. No amount of trolling would make any difference at
all---I would never stop the frenzy (funny how I keep having to relearn this.)
The media---neutral, conservative, liberal---decided to run with the
closet-of-emotional-indulgence narrative and my little comments were no match
against the online goliath. I felt defeated---and I kind of felt like a lot of
people wanted to storm universities and eliminate artists. The cry closet was a
viral sensation pitting sides against each other, the snowflake coddlers versus
the fully bucked-up bootstrap wearers. Everyone seemed to lockstep into the
binary even though the controversy was born from blatant misinformation and the
misframing of actual facts. My naive self was a little shocked--- no one seemed
to care about the basic facts. I guess it can be easier and more
entertaining to quickly choose sides and react with emotion; at first, I was
more than ready to frenzy. The art installation worked perfectly to expose some
of our societal issues. In the end, this dismayed, sorry excuse for a troll had
to wave her white flag, and the Moose won the skirmish that wasn’t really a
skirmish at all---it was all just part of the
experiment.
Okay, so I guess you’ve been waiting to hear about the Incredible
Hulk balls.
My son, like many kids, avoids vegetables at all costs. Asking him
to eat a green bean is like asking him to suck snails out of a cow
tank---although he’d probably try the latter. The “it’s a tree not broccoli and
you’re a giant not a three year old,” trick only works so long, and I knew he
couldn’t survive on chicken nuggets and meatballs alone, so I had to get
creative. One night as I started mixing up another batch of meatball
ingredients, I got a wild idea: why not add some pureed veggies---he’ll never know
they’re in there! I grabbed a bag of frozen garden fare, microwaved it, and
blended into a nice thin pulp. Turns out that mixed veggies (carrots,
cauliflower, broccoli), when pulverized, look a little like Linda Blair’s
stomach contents, aka green pea soup. Despite this slight hitch in my brilliant
plan, I powered on, formed the balls and hoped the green would fade with
frying. Nope---fully cooked, the meatballs still looked like small,
seriously ill Kermit heads. Sure it was a futile effort at this point, I put
them on a plate and called my child to the table.
As he took a seat, he skeptically eyed his plate, and I felt like
the Downton Abbey cook watching the master about to sample her flamboyant take
on pigeon pie. He stabbed a meatball with his fork and asked with a hint of
contentiousness “what_are_these?” I didn’t answer, hung my head, held my breath
and moved toward the freezer to grab the family-size chicken nugget bag. But
seconds before I succumbed to defeat, I blurted out, “They’re hulk balls! You
know, like the Incredible Hulk.” Mini Gordan Ramsay pursed his lips, looked at
me, looked at the balls, nodded and said “huh, cool.” He then popped a
veggie-infused meatball into his mouth and smiled. I spun away from the freezer
and did a little victory dance behind his back. It worked! Not only did he eat
one hulk ball, he ate them all! He hit his daily veggie dose and then some.
However, I was so focused on my achievement that what I had actually done
didn’t fully sink in until I was standing at the sink. As I scrubbed the
meatball pan, my proud smile faded when I imagined him innocently telling all
his little school friends, “last night I ate hulk balls!”
I convinced my son to see the green balls as something more
exciting and tolerable than veggie-infused ground beef. Even though I didn’t
thoroughly think it through, I controlled the framing of his experience. I
suppose this kind of perspective framing can be used for both good and evil.
The tricky part is deciding which frames are good and which ones are evil.
Perhaps the fault actually lies with that dualistic kind of thinking. The
nature of viral media is all about playing to the extremes and making big statements
in the least amount of space and time possible---exhibit A: moose fight.
In our
information overloaded world, we are most often just getting a skimming of it
all---like scraping off the fetid top layer of old milk. Blindly
accepting one frame, the rotten milk, can cause frenzied behavior and be
destructive. The limited consumption of the top layer also perfectly suits our
human inclination to perceive the world as “us” versus “other.” The art
installation cleverly played on social biases and assumptions by relying on the
idea that people wouldn’t check the facts or think beyond what was presented to
them. Who has time to continuously track down all the facts in this world of
skew? But it seems that the “truth” is buried under many layers of old and new
perspectives.
So in simply drinking the fetid milk, are we choosing ignorance
in order to comfortably sit on one side of the binary? How can this be avoided?
I guess if I find that something is leading me down a path of anger,
vilification of the other, and ultimately personal suffering, I need to make
sure that I diligently work my way through the layers. Also, what happened to
the value of imagination and delighting in the discovery of nuanced
perspectives anyway? Imagination is usually fun and enjoyable, ignorance,
at least in the end, isn’t. Wouldn’t open discourse about the possible instead
of the limited be exponentially more beneficial? The cry closet and the
hulk balls caused me to consider all of these questions (that’s a sentence
I never thought I’d write). I suppose, in a way, we are all just part of a
grand experiment, but maybe we can we make this experiment less hurtful and
destructive. I guess it could be helpful to take an occasional pause and ask
oneself: am I being served veggie-infused meatballs or Incredible Hulk balls?